Sunday, August 17, 2014

What Will be on the November 4th Ballot?

This November, Boone County residents will vote for the following:

4th Congressional District:

  • Vicky Hartzler (R) Incumbent. 
  • Nate Irvin (D)
  • Randy Langkraehr (L).
United States Senate Races

  • No election during this cycle.

Missouri State offices:
Only ONE election this cycle for state office.

State auditor.

  • Thomas Schweich (R) Incumbent.
  • Sean O'Toole (L).  
  • No Democratic candidate.
Missouri State Senate race.  No election during this cycle.


Missouri House of Representatives:

District 44-

  • Caleb Rowden (R) Incumbent.
  • Thomas Pauley (D) who is MNEA recommended.  
District 45 (Incumbent Chris Kelly decided not to seek re-election.)

  • Kip Kendrick (D). 
  • No Republican nor Libertarian candidates filled by end of deadline.  
District 46.

  • Stephen Webber (D) Incumbent.  
  • No Republican or Libertarian candidates filled by end of deadline.  
District 47.

  • John Wright (D) Incumbent. MNEA recommended.
  • Chuck Basye (R).  
Judicial Division 5:
  • Kim Shaw (D)
  • Michael Witworth (R)

_________________________________________________________________________________


 Ballot Measures (Information from www.ballotpedia.org)

Editor's note: The following Constitutional Amendments will be voted on by Missouri voters.  Please note that should these amendments be allowed to change the language of the Missouri Constitution, it is extremely difficulty to go back and change.  Constitutional Amendment changes take up to 7-10 years to reverse.  PLEASE study these issues carefully and understand the impact fully.  Below are the amendments.

(Taken directly from www.ballotpedia.org)
Amendment 2- If passed, the measure would allow relevant evidence of prior criminal acts, also known as propensity evidence, to be admissible in court in prosecutions of sexual crimes involving a victim under 18 years old. The measure was known as House Joint Resolution 16 in the Missouri State Legislature, where it was sponsored by Rep. John McCaherty (R-97).


The following language will appear on the ballot on election day:

Official Ballot Title:
Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that it will be permissible to allow relevant evidence of prior criminal acts to be admissible in prosecutions for crimes of a sexual nature involving a victim under eighteen years of age?
If more resources are needed to defend increased prosecutions additional costs to governmental entities could be at least $1.4 million annually, otherwise the fiscal impact is expected to be limited.
Fair Ballot Language:
“yes” vote will amend the Missouri Constitution to allow evidence of prior criminal acts, whether charged or uncharged, to be considered by courts in prosecutions of sexual crimes that involve a victim under eighteen years of age. The amendment limits the use of such prior acts to support the victim’s testimony or show that the person charged is more likely to commit the crime. Further, the judge may exclude such prior acts if the value of considering them is substantially outweighed by the possibility of unfair prejudice to the person charged with committing the crime.
“no” vote will not amend the Missouri Constitution regarding the use of evidence of prior criminal acts to prosecute sexual crimes.
If passed, this measure will have no impact on taxes.

Constitutional changes

If the measure is approved, it will amend Article I, Section 18 of the Missouri Constitution by adding Section 18(c) to read as follows:
Section 18(c). Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 17 and 18(a) of this article to the contrary, in prosecutions for crimes of a sexual nature involving a victim under eighteen years of age, relevant evidence of prior criminal acts, whether charged or uncharged, is admissible for the purpose of corroborating the victim's testimony or demonstrating the defendant's propensity to commit the crime with which he or she is presently charged. The court may exclude relevant evidence of prior criminal acts if the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.

Please visit: http://ballotpedia.org/Missouri_Relevant_Criminal_Evidence_Amendment,_Amendment_2_(2014)
to learn more about the impact, criticism, and support of this amendment.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

(Taken directly from www.ballotpedia.org)
Amendment 3is on the November 4, 2014 election ballot in the state of Missouri as an initiated constitutional amendment. If approved by voters, this measure would implement teacher performance evaluations that would be used to determine whether a teacher should be dismissed, retained, demoted or promoted. It would also prevent teachers from collectively bargaining over the terms of these evaluations.
If approved, the measure would add six subsections to Section 3 of Article IX of the Missouri Constitution.

Ballot title

The official ballot text reads as follows:

Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to:
  • Require teachers to be evaluated by a standards based performance evaluation system for which each local school district must receive state approval to continue receiving state and local funding;
  • Require teachers to be dismissed, retained, demoted, promoted and paid primarily using quantifiable student performance data as part of the evaluation system;
  • Require teachers to enter into contracts of three years or fewer with public school districts; and prohibit teachers from organizing or collectively bargaining regarding the design and implementation of the teacher evaluation system?

Constitutional changes

If approved, the measure would add six subsections, (d) through (i) inclusively, to Section 3 of Article IX of the Missouri Constitution. The new sections would read as follows:
Section 3(d). All certified staff shall be at will employees unless a contract is entered into between a school district and certificated staff (1) prior to the effective date of this section; or (2) pursuant to the provisions of section 3(e), 3(f), and 3(h) of this article. "Certified staff," as used in this article, shall mean employees of a school district who hold a valid certificate to teach in the State of Missouri.
Section 3(e). No school district receiving any state funding or local tax revenue funding shall enter into new contracts having a term or duration in excess of three years with certificated staff.
Section 3(f). Effective beginning July 1, 2014, and notwithstanding any provision of this constitution, any school district receiving any state funding or local tax revenue shall develop and implement a standards based performance evaluation system approved by the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. The majority of such evaluation system shall be based upon quantifiable student performance data as measured by objective criteria and such evaluation system shall be used in (1) retaining, promoting, demoting, dismissing, removing, discharging and setting compensation for certificated staff; (2) modifying or terminating any contracts with certificated staff; and (3) placing on leave of absence any certificated staff because of a decrease in pupil enrollment, school district reorganization or the financial condition or the school district.
Section 3(g). Nothing in section 3(f) shall prevent a school district from demoting, removing, discharging, or terminating a contract with certificated staff for one or more of the following causes: (1) physical or mental condition unfitting him to instruct or associate with children; (2) immoral conduct; (3) incompetency, inefficiency or insubordination in line of duty; (4) willful or persistent violation of, or failure to obey, state laws or regulations; (5) excessive or unreasonable absence from performance of duties; or (6) conviction of a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude.
Section 3(h). In any suit to challenge a school district's decision regarding retention, promotion, demotion, dismissal, removal, discharge, modification or termination of contracts, or setting compensation of certified staff, except for decisions made for any of the causes listed in section 3(g) of this Article, the person bringing such suit must establish that the school district failed to properly utilize the standards based performance evaluation system as referenced in Section 3(f) of this Article.

Section 3(i). Certificated staff shall retain the right to organize and to bargain collectively as provided in article I, section 29 of this Constitution, expect with respect to the design and implementation of the performance based evaluation system established in this article, and as otherwise referenced in this article.

Fiscal impact

According to the official ballot title published by the secretary of state:
Decisions by school districts regarding provisions allowed or required by this proposal and their implementation will influence the potential costs or savings impacting each district. Significant potential costs may be incurred by the state and/or the districts if new/additional evaluation instruments must be developed to satisfy the proposal’s performance evaluation requirements.

I strongly ask that you visit http://ballotpedia.org/Missouri_Teacher_Performance_Evaluation,_Amendment_3_(2014) to learn more about this harmful amendment to our public educational system.  This amendment has become top priority to MNEA members, and there will be more information coming very soon concerning this amendment.
   __________________________________________________________________________________

(Taken directly from www.ballotpedia.org)
Amendment 6is on the November 4, 2014 ballot in Missouri as a legislatively-referred constitutional amendment. The measure, upon voter approval, would establish a six-day long early voting period starting in 2016.
The measure was sponsored in the Missouri Legislature by Rep. Tony Dugger (R-141) as House Joint Resolution 90.
An initiated constitutional amendment, which would provide six weeks of early voting, including some weekends, may appear on the same ballot. If the early voting initiative joins the legislative version on the ballot and both are approved, state law provides that the measure which receives the most votes would take precedent.

Official Ballot Title:
Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to permit voting in person or by mail for a period of six business days prior to and including the Wednesday before the Election Day in all general elections?
State governmental entities estimated startup costs of about $2 million and costs to reimburse local election authorities of at least $100,000 per election. Local election authorities estimated higher reimbursable costs per election. Those costs will depend on the compensation, staffing, and, planning decisions of election authorities with the total costs being unknown.
Fair Ballot Language:
“yes” vote will amend the Missouri Constitution to permit voters, in years when the legislature provides funding, an early voting period of six business days prior to and including the Wednesday before Election Day to cast a ballot in all general elections. This amendment does not allow early voting on Saturday or Sunday.
“no” vote will not amend the Missouri Constitution to provide all voters with a six-business day early voting period.
If passed, this measure will have no impact on taxes.

Visit : http://ballotpedia.org/Missouri_Early_Voting_Period,_Amendment_6_(2014) to learn more about this amendment.

______________________________________________________________________________
(Taken from www.ballotpedia.org)
 Amendment 10 - is on the November 4, 2014 ballot in Missouri as a legislatively-referred constitutional amendment. The measure, upon voter approval, would prohibit the governor from estimating available state revenues when making budget recommendations to the legislature in situations where estimated available state revenues are determined from proposed, but not yet approved, legislation. The measure would allow the governor to estimate unspent revenues that will constitute a surplus from the immediately preceding fiscal year or years in his or her budget recommendation. Also, the amendment would prohibit the governor from reducing appropriations for the payment of public debt.
The measure was sponsored in the Missouri Legislature by Rep. Todd Richardson (R-152) as House Joint Resolution 72.
Official Ballot Title:
Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to require the governor to pay the public debt, to prohibit the governor from relying on revenue from legislation not yet passed when proposing a budget, and to provide a legislative check on the governor’s decisions to restrict funding for education and other state services?
State governmental entities expect no direct costs or savings. Local governmental entities expect an unknown fiscal impact.
Fair Ballot Language:
“yes” vote will amend the Missouri Constitution regarding the requirements placed on the governor for proposing a state budget and for withholding money appropriated in the budget passed by the legislature. This amendment prohibits the governor from reducing funding passed by the general assembly without receiving legislative consent, and provides certain other restrictions on the governor’s ability to increase or decrease line items in the budget. This amendment further prohibits the governor from proposing a budget that relies on revenue from legislation that has not yet passed in the general assembly.
“no” vote will not amend the Missouri Constitution regarding the requirements placed on the governor for proposing a state budget and for withholding money appropriated in the budget passed by the legislature.
If passed, this measure will have no impact on taxes.

Constitutional changes

See also: Missouri Gubernatorial Budgetary Recommendations Amendment, HJR 72 (2014), constitutional text changes
If approved, HJR 72 would amend Section 24 and Section 27 of Article IV of the Missouri Constitution.
Visit: http://ballotpedia.org/Missouri_Gubernatorial_Budgetary_Recommendations,_Amendment_10_(2014)
to learn more about this amendment.






Important Deadlines for the November 4th Ballot

Now that the Primary elections of August are over, here are some important dates for you to remember for registering to vote, and voting absentee.

Official Election Day: November 4, 2014
Style of Election: General Election
Last Day to Register to Vote: October 8, 2014
Saturday Hours: October 4, 2014 & November 1, 2014
Application Deadline for Absentee Ballots to be Mailed to Voter: October 29, 2014
Deadline for Absentee Voting in Person in the County Clerk's Office: November 3, 2014

You may register to vote by going to the Boone County Clerk's website: www.Showmeboone.com

Sunday, August 3, 2014

Ballot Summary for the August 5th Primary

Before heading out to the polls this Tuesday, please take a moment to read about the amendments, initiatives, and primary candidates for: congress, MO House of Representatives, Division V judgeship, and county recorder.  Missouri voters may ask for either a nonpartisan ballot, a Republican ballot, or a Democratic ballot.  As a reminder, MNEA has made the following recommendations for our Mid-Missouri area: Rep. Stephen Webber- House District 46, Rep. John Wright- House District 47  and Candidate Tom Pauley for MO House district 44.  All are Democrats and unopposed in Aug. primary election.  MNEA took the position of NO position for Amendment 8.  MNEA will screen and decide the 4th Congressional District after the primary election.  Below is the summary of the ballot from the Columbia Missourian.

VOTERS GUIDE: What you need to know before Tuesday's primary election

Sunday, August 3, 2014 | 6:00 a.m. CDT
In Tuesday's primary election, Boone County voters will decide on five proposed state constitutional amendments, a county parks initiative, and candidates for a U.S. congressional seat, a seat in the state House of Representatives, the county recorder of deeds and a Division V associate circuit court judge.
Before you go
Polls are open from 6 a.m. to 7 p.m. The Boone County Clerk's website has information about polling place locations and a quick search to find a voter's specific site.
Voters need to take a form of identification with them to the polls— a voter ID card, a driver's license or state-issued ID.
In a Missouri primary election, voters must choose one political party ballot or a  non-partisan ballot.
Election workers at polling places will ask a voter to choose one of four parties — Democrat, Republican, Libertarian or Constitution.
Voters will receive a ballot formatted so they may only select candidates from that party. All candidates will be on the ballot, even if they are unopposed.
Those who choose a non-partisan ballot will vote only on the non-partisan ballot issues.

Voters can change their address online at the Boone County Clerk website — even on Election Day.
For more information call the Voter Registration Office at 886-4375 or the Voter Information Hotline at 875-8683.
The Missourian staff put together this guide to help you become informed about the candidates and the issues before you vote.
STATEWIDE
BALLOT INITIATIVES 
Summary: The so-called "Right to Farm" amendment to the state constitution would "forever guarantee" the rights of ranchers and farmers to engage in practices related to farming and ranching.
Official ballot language: "Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to ensure that the right of Missouri citizens to engage in agricultural production and ranching practices shall not be infringed?
"The potential costs or savings to governmental entities are unknown, but likely limited unless the resolution leads to increased litigation costs and/or the loss of federal funding."
History: The effort to fold this protected status into the constitution stems from the passage in 2010 of Proposition B, known as the "Puppy Mill Cruelty Prevention Act" — the law that regulates conditions under which breeders can keep dogs. The law's passage alarmed farm organizations. Especially troubling was original language in the law that defined pets as "any domesticated animal normally maintained in or near the household of the owner thereof." It also capped the number of breeding pets at 50. The legislature and Gov. Jay Nixon later revised the language and altered the limit on the number of animals a farmer or rancher could own.
Pro: Supporters claim Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations and other agricultural production methods need the amendment as protection from harmful and unnecessary regulations.
Con: Opponents say its vague language would give too much power to large agribusinesses and leave local governments without much regulatory muscle.
Summary: The measure declares the right to keep and bear arms as “unalienable,” which gives it protective status in the constitution. It adds defense of families to the right of weapon use to defend home, property and person. The amendment also would repeal legal language that allows exclusion of concealed weapons in the right to bear arms. Legislators could still restrict the gun rights of convicted violent felons and people with mental illnesses.
Official ballot language: "Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to include a declaration that the right to keep and bear arms is a unalienable right and that the state government is obligated to uphold that right?
"State and local governmental entities should have no direct costs or savings from this proposal. However, the proposal’s passage will likely lead to increased litigation and criminal justice related costs. The total potential costs are unknown, but could be significant."
History: The measure's sponsor, Sen. Kurt Schaefer, R-Columbia, has told the press that the state constitution needs to be updated and aligned with the U.S. Constitution in light of two U.S. Supreme Court decisions — one that protects an individual’s right to own guns and another that prevents states from infringing on the right to keep and bear arms. 
Pro: The Second Amendment should have the highest level of protection, much the way the Fourth Amendment has succeeded over time and litigation in protecting citizens from unlawful search and seizure.
Con: It opens the possibility of more widespread gun possession, including concealed weapons. Some police spokesmen have argued that it would put the public and officers at risk. If everyone has "unalienable" gun rights, it could also hamper the ability of prosecutors to pursue a case and complicate decisions by a jury.
Summary: A proposed three-quarter-cent sales tax would generate an estimated $540 million a year for 10 years to fund 800 projects for the Missouri Department of Transportation. The vast majority of the projects are to repair and resurface roads and bridges, construct or improve interchanges and sidewalks, and add lanes to existing highways.
In Boone County, most of the money would be dedicated to an extension of Stadium Boulevard, adding lanes to Interstate 70, reconfiguring the I-70/U.S. 63 interchange, building a new terminal at Columbia Regional Airport and increasing the number of service hours to the bus system. The tax would not be collected on food, medicine or gasoline, and the state could not implement toll roads or raise fuel taxes during the 10-year period.
Official ballot language: "Should the Missouri Constitution be changed to enact a temporary sales tax of three-quarters of one percent to be used solely to fund state and local highways, roads, bridges and transportation projects for ten years, with priority given to repairing unsafe roads and bridges?
"This change is expected to produce $480 million annually to the state's Transportation Safety and Job Creation Fund and $54 million for local governments.  Increases in the gas tax will be prohibited.  This revenue shall only be used for transportation purposes and cannot be diverted for other uses."
History: According to the MoDOT, it takes about $485 million every year to maintain the state's system of highways and bridges. If nothing changes, by 2017, the revenue will drop to $325 million, and Missouri's roads and bridges will deteriorate. Even with higher gas prices, the state gets 17 cents per gallon to support transportation, and that amount hasn't changed in 20 years. MoDOT also doesn’t have the ability to raise funds through bonding because the agency has reached its bonding capacity, paying about $300 million a year to pay off existing bonds.
Pro: Missouri's highways, bridges, roads and sidewalks are deteriorating, and there is insufficient revenue to repair and maintain them. The state highway system is larger than Kansas and Illinois combined, and Missouri ranks sixth nationally in number of bridges. Revenue from this temporary 10-year sales tax would be used for transportation projects across the state.
Con: This is a regressive tax that will unfairly affect low-income workers, the poor, the elderly and students. A more fair assessment on users would be to increase the fuel tax, which is among the lowest in the nation. Long-haul trucks are high-impact users of state highways, but drivers or hauling companies don't pay to maintain them. Highway and bridge building and repairs should be paid for by the people and businesses that use them.
Summary: Amendment 8 would create a separate scratch-off lottery ticket by next July to help finance veterans' homes and services. There are no estimates on potential revenue, which would hinge on how many tickets are sold.
Official ballot language: "Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to create a 'Veterans Lottery Ticket' and to use the revenue from the sale of these tickets for projects and services related to veterans?
"The annual cost or savings to state and local governmental entities is unknown, but likely minimal.
"If sales of a veterans lottery ticket game decrease existing lottery ticket sales, the profits of which fund education, there could be a small annual shift in funding from education to veterans’ programs."
History: After the state legislature cut the $29 million in general revenue from the Missouri Veterans Commission budget in 2012, the commission has increasingly relied on a trust fund set up to help maintain, repair and construct veterans homes and cemeteries operated by the commission. The $30 million in the Veterans Commission Capital Improvement Trust Fund is enough to maintain operations but not enough to expand or build new homes.
There are seven state veterans homes, including one in Mexico, Mo., with 1,350 total beds, as well as five cemeteries in Missouri for veterans. The Veterans Commission estimates that about 1,800 veterans are on a waiting list for the homes.
Pro: Missouri would join Kansas, Iowa, Illinois and Texas as states that have approved a similar funding source for veterans. Each has raised between $10 million and $33 million to support veterans this way. Generating revenue to support military veterans is a worthy cause that honors those who have served the country.
Con: Currently, profits from the lottery are allocated to education. Some of this money could be diverted by a veterans lottery ticket. This measure would give the state legislature license to ignore veterans' needs and make veterans' services dependent on an uncertain revenue stream.
Summary: The measure asks voters to decide whether to add electronic communications and data to the list of things already protected from unreasonable search and seizure by state law. If approved, the amendment would extend protection to information on electronic devices such as cellphones, laptops and tablets.
Official ballot language: "Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended so that the people shall be secure in their electronic communications and data from unreasonable searches and seizures as they are now likewise secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects?
"State and local governmental entities expect no significant costs or savings."
History: In light of the Edward Snowden revelations about surveillance programs under the jurisdiction of the National Security Agency, there is a movement toward protection from unwarranted searches and seizures of electronic information.
Pro: The amendment will update existing protections by adding information shared in the modern technological age. It makes a level playing field for all law enforcement agencies in Missouri. It will help prevent government from pre-emptively collecting electronic information if a crime has not been committed.  
Con: The measure is unnecessary. In June, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that police need a warrant to search a cellphone. Many law enforcement agencies are already operating under the intent of the proposed change. Without a clear definition of electronic communication, the measure will invite costly litigation.

Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/news/government-politics/voters-guide/article807510.html#storylink=cpy
LEGISLATIVE RACES
Summary: Elizabeth "Betsy" Phillips and Chuck Basye are competing for the Republican nomination for Missouri's 47th House District, which includes portions of Boone, Randolph, Howard and Cooper counties. Democrat John Wright is unopposed in the primary.
Chuck Basye: Basye, 56, is a former U.S. Marine and retired air traffic controller. Basye wants to boost agriculture and is an adamant supporter of the "Right to Farm" bill. He said he wants to cut taxes, rein in government spending, remove outdated government regulations and continue to fund public education at a quality level. He and his wife live on a small farm near Rocheport.
Betsy Phillips: Phillips, 76, has lived near Columbia for 14 years. As president of the Boone County Pachyderm Club, she has been a figure in local political organizing for at least six years. She has been active in environmental causes, supports fair treatment of immigrants and believes in government service.
Summary: Republican John Webb will challenge U.S. Rep. Vicky Hartzler for the GOP nomination in the 4th Congressional District primary. Two Libertarians, Randall Langkraehr and Herschel Young, will face off for the Libertarian nomination. Democrat Nate Irvin is unchallenged.
Republicans
Vicki Hartzler: Hartzler, 53, first elected to the House in 2010, is rounding out her second two-year term in Congress. Before joining the U.S. House of Representatives, she was a public school teacher, a small-business owner and a state representative. In the House, she serves on the Armed Services, Agriculture and Budget committees. She lives on a working farm in Cass County with her husband and daughter.
John Webb: Webb, 60, considers himself a constitutional fiscal conservative. He said he is seeking public office for the first time to “reduce the size and scope of the federal government at every possible level.” He was a member of the Kansas City Police Department from 1971 to 1983, leaving the department because of a permanent injury. He lives in Cass County with his wife, has two children and four grandchildren.
Libertarians
Randall "Randy" Langkraehr: Langkraehr lives in Warrensburg. He owns and operates three small businesses, including a tax and bookkeeping office and Davken Co., a marketing business. He became a licensed real estate broker in 1986.
Herschel Young: Young, 46, is a Cass County native and has served in the U.S. Army. He said he is running because he wants to "reduce the tax burden on U.S. citizens." He was elected Cass County presiding commissioner in 2010 but was removed from office because of an earlier felony. State law prevents felons from holding office, but federal law does not. He and his wife live in Harrisonville.
BOONE COUNTY
BALLOT INITIATIVE
Summary: The proposition is intended to provide more funds to run the Central Missouri Events Center, Home of the Boone County Fair, and to fund parks and recreation projects throughout the county. The six-year tax increase is expected to generate between $2 million and $3 million per year. At least $500,000 a year would go into a grant fund for parks. The rest would be split between improving and maintaining the events center and developing areas on the 144-acre property.
Official ballot language: "Shall Boone County, Missouri, impose a new county-wide sales tax at a rate of one-eighth of one percent for the purposes of providing funding for parks, recreation, and economic development, including the Central Missouri Events Center at the Boone County Fairgrounds, to include the acquisition, improvement, construction, and equipping of facilities for said purposes and operating the same? The authorization for this sales tax shall expire on December 31, 2020."
History: The events center and surrounding land have been a point of concern since they were purchased by the county 15 years ago. The center has been run by TAG Events since 2011 with the county providing $275,000 per year to fund operations and utility costs. County commissioners are unwilling to continue the subsidy, and if the measure doesn't pass, the future of the center is uncertain.
Pro: The 144-acre events center has been underused by the county and the city and needs a significant investment to be successful and attract more events. 
Con: The tax would unfairly place the burden of the events center on the public, the property has been poorly managed and the plans for the center are vague.
COUNTY RACES
Summary: Five candidates have filed to be on the ballot to replace retiring Division V Associate Circuit Judge Larry Bryson. The three Democrats and two Republicans will be narrowed to one candidate per party, who will appear on the Nov. 5 general election ballot. Bryson announced in January that he would retire from Missouri's 13th Circuit Court at the end of the year after 28 years in the position because of retirement rules that would not allow him to fulfill another four-year term.
Democrats
Robert Fleming: Fleming, 58, of Rocheport is an assistant public defender in the 14th Judicial Circuit in Moberly. He worked for the Missouri State Tax Commission for four years before and after graduating from MU School of Law. He was the assistant Boone County prosecutor from 1984 to 1986 and spent four years in private trial litigation practice in Columbia. In 1990, he joined the Missouri State Public Defender System where he’s been for more than 20 years.
Finley Gibbs: Gibbs, 49, graduated from MU School of Law in 1996. He is a partner at Rotts & Gibbs, a law firm in Columbia, which he joined in 1997. He became a partner in 2000.  He has worked on criminal defense cases, as well as cases related to family law, traffic matters, car crashes and personal injury.
Kim Shaw: Shaw, 53, is an assistant public defender in the 13th Judicial Circuit, which includes Boone and Callaway counties. She graduated from MU School of Law in 1989, spent two years as a public defender in Cape Girardeau County, then returned to Columbia to work in the Central Capital Division, where she handled death penalty jury trials. She was promoted to district defender before she started her own firm in 2000. She returned to public service nine years later.
Republicans
Doug Shull: Shull runs his own practice at the Law Office of C. Douglas Shull in Columbia.
Michael Whitworth: Whitworth, 59, is an attorney at the firm of Ford, Parshall, & Baker in Columbia. After graduating from St. Louis University Law School in 1985, he became an assistant attorney general for Missouri. He left the position in 1991 to go into private practice focusing on criminal cases and family law.
Summary: Three candidates are vying to replace Bettie Johnson, who is retiring after 35 years as Boone County recorder of deeds. Two Democrats, Nora Dietzel and Lois Miller, face each other in the primary, while Republican Lisa Ballenger is unopposed. All three have experience in the Recorder's Office under Johnson. The Recorder's Office files and maintains marriage licenses, real estate documents, veterans' discharge records and tax liens.
Nora Dietzel: Dietzel, 49, has worked in the Recorder's Office for 17 years, 10 as lead deputy. She began a career in banking after attending MU, then joined the Recorder's Office in 1996. She was responsible for converting the manual accounting setup to a digital system. She and her husband have two grown sons.
Lois Miller: Miller, 61, has been with the office for 25 years, since the records were kept by hand. A lifelong resident of Boone County, she and her husband have three children and eight grandchildren.


Friday, August 1, 2014

Who Does NEA Politically Support

(CMNEA Blog editor's note: NEA/MNEA/CMNEA receive PAC funds from members who VOLUNTARILY donate.)  For those of you who believe that the NEA politically support only Democrats, read blog entry from Education Week below:



Snapshot of Teacher Union Spending on House, Senate Campaigns

August recess will soon be upon us. All day Friday, members of Congress will be hoping to flee the Capitol for their home districts, where, for the next five weeks, many of them will be canvassing neighborhoods in one last big campaign push toward the midterm congressional elections.
The homestretch of campaign season is typically marked by last-ditch fundraising efforts and massive spending on advertising, marketing, and grassroots, door-to-door types of initiatives.  A couple of weeks ago, we blogged about a few competitive races that could have repercussions for education legislation in Congress. But now, in advance of lawmakers heading out on the campaign trail, we thought we'd give you a look at the top recipients of education-focused political action committee, or PAC, dollars, namely from the two national teachers' unions.
OpenSecrets, the nonpartisan campaign-finance tracker, looked at Federal Election Commission campaign filings and separated out an incredibly handy list of recipients of donations from the American Federation of Teachers and the National Education Association. Please note that this is data released by the FEC on July 21 and does not account for teachers' unions donations to other PACs and organizations that fund various campaigns. The next available set of funding data will be out at the end of September, when lawmakers are back from their summer break.
HOUSE CAMPAIGNS
Top Recipients from American Federation of Teachers:
  • In total, the AFT gave $1.4 million to House Democrats in the 2014 election cycle, compared to $5,000 to Republicans.
  • Democratic Reps. Gwen Moore of Wisconsin and Robin Kelly of Illinois were the big winners, raking in $15,000 and $14,000, respectively.
  • AFT gave $10,000 to 96 House Democrats, including notables like Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California, Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer of Maryland, and nearly every Democratic member of the Education and the Workforce Committee.
  • In addition, the AFT donated to one Republican, $5,000 to Richard Hanna of New York.
Top Recipients from National Education Association:
  • In total, the NEA gave $857,550 to House Democrats in the 2014 election cycle compared to $59,500 to Republicans.
  • NEA gave $10,000—its largest donation—to 32 House Democrats, including Pelosi. But the teachers' union contributed its largest sum to just seven of the 18 Democrats on the education committee.
  • The teachers' union spread the love to Republican incumbents, funding 21 GOP campaigns, up from 17 during the 2012 cycle. The big winners include Rep. David Valadao of California, who collected $10,000, Rep. Rodney Davis of Illinois, who raked in $7,000, and Reps. David Joyce of Ohio and Glenn Thompson of Pennsylvania, who each received $5,000.
SENATE CAMPAIGNS
Top Recipients from American Federation of Teachers:
  • In total, the AFT gave $210,000 to Senate Democrats in the 2014 election cycle and no money to Republicans.
  • Sen. Ed Markey of Massachusetts received the largest contribution from the AFT at $20,000. Markey, you might remember, served in the House from 1976 until being elected last year to fill John Kerry's seat after Kerry was appointed Secretary of State.
  • The teachers' union gave 12 incumbent Democrats $10,000 apiece, including Sen. Kay Hagan of North Carolina, who is in a hotly-contested battle with state Speaker Thom Tillis; Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey, the high-profile former Newark, N.J., mayor who won in a special election to replace Sen. Frank Lautenberg, who died in office; Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island, a big player in the college affordability arena; and powerful Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin of Illinois.
  • The AFT also funded Democratic challengers in high-profile races, giving $10,000 apiece to Rep. Bruce Braley of Iowa, who is struggling in his race against state senator Joni Ernst to replace retiring Sen. Tom Harkin, chairman of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee; Alison Grimes, who is taking on Minority Leader Mitch McConnell in Kentucky; Gary Peters, who is vying for Michigan's open seat against Republican Terri Lynn Land, the former Michigan Secretary of State; Michelle Nunn, whose leaked campaign memo has put her Senate race in Georgia against David Perdue in jeopardy; and Natalie Tennant, whose competitor in West Virginia's Senate race, Rep. Shelly Capito, has a sizeable lead in the race for retiring Sen. Jay Rockefeller's seat.
Top Recipients from National Education Association:
  • In total, the NEA gave $168,750 to Senate Democrats in the 2014 election cycle and just $3,000 to Republicans.
  • Markey was the favorite again, with the NEA contributing $20,000 to his campaign.
  • The teachers' union donated $10,000 to seven incumbent Democrats, including Sen. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, who is in a tight race, and Sen. Al Franken of Minnesota, who is a member of the HELP and whose campaign is considered only slightly competitive. The NEA gave Hagan, who also serves on HELP Committee, $9,000.
  • The NEA also funded Democratic challengers, giving $12,000 to Braley, and $10,000 apiece to Grimes, Peters, and Rick Weiland, who has an uphill battle in North Dakota against former governor Mike Rounds to replace retiring Sen. Tim Johnson, also a Democrat.
  • NEA divvied up $3,000 between three Senate Republicans, Mike Enzi of Wyoming, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, and Jerry Moran of Kansas.