Sunday, October 30, 2016

Come Help Stephen Webber This Saturday

GOTV Rally for Stephen Webber
The election is around the corner, and your help is needed now more than ever!

The stakes are high for our community. 

Our campaign has had the support of community members and volunteers for months as we've talked to Mid-Missourians about Stephen's leadership, and his service to our community. 

I know Stephen will stand up for and serve Mid-Missouri in the State Senate: but we need to make sure supporters and members of our community make that real by voting on Election Day.

Please join us for our last big Saturday canvass as we
Get Out The Vote for November 8th

907 E. Ash Street
1:00 PM, Saturday, Nov. 5th

Questions? Want more opportunities to help us turn out voters? 
Contact connor@votewebber.com, or (626) 353-7955.

Onward,
Connor
Field Organizer
Citizens for Stephen Webber

Event for MNEA Endorsed Candidates Next Sunday

YOUR VOTE MATTERS!!!!
Rally to Elect Hillary Clinton
AND
The Entire Democratic Ticket


LET’S MAKE 
BOONE COUNTY 

AND 
MISSOURI 
BLUE!!!!

Sun, Nov 6, 2016 – 3:00 pm-5:00 pm

Home of Betty Wilson
1719 University Avenue
Columbia, MO

Candidates, Staffers, Supporters Families of all ages
EVERYONE is welcome

Costumes welcome 
(come as your favorite candidate, surrogate, metaphor, symbol, cartoon)

Parade of Costumes, mock voting, all attendees eligible

Cider and donuts provided, beverage and appetite of your choice welcome

Saturday, October 29, 2016

Tribune's View on House Seat 47



THE TRIBUNE'S VIEW

District 47

The race for state representative in the 47th District is rather typical this
year. Incumbent Republican Chuck Basye is part of a consistent House
majority that has become too conservative. They have expanded on the
national party’s antipathy for government, rendering Missouri near or
at the bottom in several categories of needed public funding support.
Give them credit for reflecting what their constituencies want. Legislative
victories in rural areas have fostered a gerrymandered Republican
majority in the General Assembly even more pronounced than in the
national Congress. Once a natural conservative like Basye is elected,
he is bound to become part of a solid right-of-center bloc.
Central Missouri has typically elected one of the state’s more moderate
 legislative delegations. The 47th District has over time become more
balanced. In a very close vote four years ago, Basye wrested the district
from one-term progressive John Wright, changing the vote from the
district on several key issues.
Democrat Susan McClintic would go the other way on funding for
education, roads and expansion of Medicaid, to name three issues
that characterize the difference between them.
Being for the Democrat on such issues this year is far from an
uber-liberal choice. In their refusal to consider tax increases,
Basye and the Republican General Assembly have dangerously
abandoned basic state responsibilities.

Adopting today’s Democratic approaches would move Missouri
back toward the center in measures such as funding for public
schools, roads and Medicaid.
Republicans, with Basye’s help, not only failed to fully fund the public
school foundation formula; they reduced the formula standard for full
funding, a double whammy. They refused to consider expanding
Medicaid funding with federal subsidies, which would have added
hundreds of millions of dollars to the state economy and provided
needed healthcare to some 300,000 needy citizens.
The House failed to take up a modest motor fuel tax increase for
roads, a Republican leadership decision Basye says he disagreed
with.
Here’s the deal. Chuck Basye is a principled man from a very
conservative family. He should not be castigated for his actions
in the Missouri House, but the district and the state will
be better off with the approach of a Rep. Susan McClintic.
McClintic has been a Columbia Public Schools teacher and union leader.
Some opponents call her a “union boss,” a misnomer, as anyone familiar
with the situation knows. She knows how the political system works. She
is fairly critical of the legislature for handing out tax cuts instead of funding
schools. She explains opponents are wrong to say Medicaid is part of
Obamacare.
She recognizes the limitations the minority party has in the legislature but
says a somewhat enlarged group can bring more pressure on the majority.
She faults Republicans and Basye for jumping on the bandwagon criticizing
the University of Missouri during student protests last year.
The bottom line is the generic difference between today’s Republicans
and Democrats. Of course, it would be possible to go too far, but for the
foreseeable future the General Assembly needs more of the influence a
sensible Democrat can bring.
Susan McClintic for state representative, 47th District.

Wednesday, October 26, 2016

Tribune's View on Lt. Govenor


Lieutenant governor

Parson vs. Carnahan

In this race I traditionally make a suggestion you won’t find elsewhere.
Whether that makes me a genius or a fool is for you to decide.
My suggestion begins with the argument the office should be eliminated.
It has been largely a waste of time when the lieutenant governor and
the governor are compatible. When they are of opposite parties, the
chances for interference with good management of the executive
branch outweigh any advantageous service the lieutenant might render.
Political parties and voters do not choose lieutenant governors for
their ability to succeed debilitated governors. In Missouri, the lieutenant
governor is a political appendage we could do without.
Having gotten nowhere with this idea, I resort to the next-best idea:
The governor and lieutenant governor should run as a team, as in
the federal system. The advantages are obvious. The two can work
in tandem to further the initiatives voters support. A succeeding
lieutenant governor can be expected to continue the policies and
practices of his former partner.
Careful observers of the scene will notice I also have failed to get
anywhere with this idea, so finally I settle on a suggestion that can
work if voters cooperate: choosing the lieutenant governor of the
same party as the governor.
At least this is an informal way to put a politically compatible team
in office. Since the two arrive on the ballot by disparate routes, one
can’t be sure they are of the same mind, but the chances are better
than if the two top candidates are from opposing parties.
So there it is. Eric Greitens and Mike Parson vs. Chris Koster and
Russ Carnahan, the Republican team or the Democratic team.
PS: I’m for Koster for governor and, according to the Hank doctrine
outlined above, will dutifully choose his partisan mate for lieutenant
 governor.

Tribune's View on U.S. Senate Race


U.S. Senate

Blunt vs. Kander

The dominant factor in this year’s election is the shift to the right in the
Republican Party. It’s a tidal wave that has produced the nomination
of Donald Trump for president, washed statewide partisans such
as Kurt Schaefer on the rocks and now threatens U.S. Sen. Roy Blunt.
This year Blunt is between that rock and a hard place. In normal
times the last thing he would do is support the likes of Donald
Trump. But now, as the tea party wing of the party holds the
GOP establishment hostage, Blunt & Co. are trapped. He and
other mainline GOP colleagues whisper they will vote for the
party nominee, hoping this torturous decision will keep the
support of Trump voters without losing traditional mainliners.
It might be an impossible stretch.
I’ve always liked Roy Blunt, but now he is part of the new Republican
orthodoxy that opposes anything labeled “D,” particularly the
Obama administration.
This has caused him to line up repeatedly with fellow Republicans
voting to repeal the Affordable Care Act, an empty flourish aimed
at keeping the oppo-bloc revved up. If re-elected, Blunt will be a
dependable vote for an agenda dictated by the right wing of the
party. In November election, he will vote for Donald Trump largely
because, he says, he can’t abide an “Obama third term,” a comment
without particular substance but with considerable campaign appeal
among the “Never Hillary” crowd.
Indeed, most Republicans who support Trump cite antipathy for Hillary
Clinton. A few have broken ranks, but most are in that hard spot: not
in favor of Trump’s GOP vision but terrified of losing his partisan voters.
These stretched-out Republicans pray their moderate supporters will
coalesce with tea party types to make a majority, a chancy proposition.
In Missouri, Blunt clings to this swaying reed. He hopes to win Missouri
in a squeak by hanging on to Trump’s fraying electoral coattail. In statewide
Missouri elections, gerrymandered state legislative constituencies often
are overwhelmed by a more homogeneous electorate giving Democrats
a better shot. Partisans can’t gerrymander a single statewide district.
Blunt’s Democratic opponent is Missouri Secretary of State Jason Kander,
a promising officeholder with a bright political future. In a normal year,
Kander would be a decided underdog. This year he and Blunt are
neck-and-neck.
If elected, Kander would be a competent senator and appealing
for many because he would not be another retrograde Republican.
He would work to overturn Citizens United, the 5-4 Supreme Court
decision allowing unlimited campaign contributions. He would
support a President Clinton’s appointments to the U.S. Supreme
Court. He would work to upgrade, not defeat, the Affordable Care
Act. And so on.
In other words, Jason Kander would resist the reactionary Republican
tidal wave. He could very well be part of a Democratic takeover of
the Senate, which would be a good thing at this moment in history.
If we are to have a Republican, I would just as soon have Roy Blunt as
any I know, but even my old friend is hopelessly hamstrung by a party
that has lurched out of bounds. If he were a true outlier opponent of
Trump and today’s GOP majority, I’d carry his banner and buy him
a drink, but I know of no such political animal. Even Blunt is
engulfed in the unacceptable right-wing political surge. I’ll buy
him a drink any day, but this year I can’t carry his political banner.
Jason Kander for U.S. Senate.

Saturday, October 22, 2016

Event for Stephen Webber


Tribune's View for House Seat 44








THE TRIBUNE'S VIEW

44th District

Reisch vs. Pauley

The race to succeed Republican Caleb Rowden in the Missouri House of
Representatives 44th District pits two political veterans against each other.
Republican Cheri Reisch and Democrat Tom Pauley have been civil
adversaries in Hallsville, a jurisdiction known for considerable political
scuffling. Both candidates are persistent and determined. Both have
good reputations for honesty. Depending on your partisan leaning,
either could do a good job in the Missouri General Assembly.
But they present a distinct choice to voters next month. Both can com-
promise on occasion, but Reisch is a real Republican and Pauley is
a real Democrat.
Reisch is against Medicaid expansion and for right-to-work. Pauley
takes the opposite side on each. Pauley accuses Republicans of tax policies
that starve education and public infrastructure; Reisch says tax cuts
will increase revenue.
Pauley supports abortion choice, and Reisch touts her support from
Missouri Right to Life.
Both candidates have been active in their respective party organizations.
Both are persistent and ready to fight for their beliefs. They represent
the split political sentiments in the 44th District, but this year Tom
Pauley is on the right side of history.
The Missouri General Assembly has been gerrymandered into one of the
most conservative in the nation, pushing Missouri into outlier status on
several fronts. Refusal to participate in federally subsidized expansion of
Medicaid is an example. Our position as a poor state in support of education,
roads and other infrastructure does not call for suddenly becoming a high-tax
state; we merely need to become average to turn the tide.
Except for the resistance of a Democratic governor, Missouri would have
become another Kansas in budget parsimony.
So, even though Cheri Reisch is a good representative of doctrinaire Republican
positions, now is the time for mitigating, not preserving, her party’s grip on l
egislative direction. It will take more than the election of Tom Pauley to correct
 the imbalance, but a switch in the 44th District is a step in the right direction.
Pauley is experienced in legislative affairs. He was an intern in the office of Rep.
Chuck Graham. He lobbied for years to repeal the motorcycle helmet law, learning
the legislative process. Even though he would be a minority member, he knows
the “nuts and bolts” of the system.
Tom Pauley for state representative, 44th District.

Tribune's view for State Senate


State Senate

Rowden vs. Webber in District 19

Republican Caleb Rowden and Democrat Stephen Webber square off against each other
for election to the Missouri Senate from our local District 19. It’s the district recently
vacated by Kurt Schaefer, who recently ran and lost the Republican primary race for
state attorney general.
Both Rowden and Webber are graduating from service in local districts in the Missouri
House of Representatives.
Rowden has the more difficult case to make. As a Republican, he is torn between support for his party’s statewide conservative positions and popular local issues such as funding for the
University of Missouri, expansion of Medicaid, ethics reform and campaign funding
limits. He has tried to be on both sides, but the stretch is painful.
That does not mean Rowden’s GOP persona will miss the mark with everyone in the
19th District, but it includes Webber’s previous House constituency, which is strongly
Democratic. As part of the legislative minority, Webber has been kept from passing bills
or otherwise making a large mark in office, but not being in league with the Republican
majority is not an indictment.
Indeed, in his eight years in office Stephen Webber has become popular because of his
personal characteristics and moderate policy positions. His support extends beyond the
traditional Democratic base. He has shown himself as thoughtful and honest, thoroughly likeable and principled.
In short, Stephen Webber is the sort of person we always should look for when choosing
people for public office, particularly this year in the race in Senate District 19.
Caleb Rowden is unconvincing in his attempt to straddle the political divide. He is a
dependable vote for the reactionary status quo in the Missouri General Assembly. We
should elect Stephen Webber for Missouri Senate, District 19.

Tribune's View for Secretary of State


THE TRIBUNE'S VIEW

Secretary of State

Jay Ashcroft vs. Robin Smith

In the race for Missouri secretary of state, two candidates with good credentials for
office but divergent political philosophies stand off against each other.
Robin Smith, 62, who recently retired after nearly 40 years as a St. Louis television news personality, has a strong mind and clear ideas about what the office is about. She is more
than a talking head, though she talks a good game. She is a member of the St. Louis
University Board of Trustees and holds a degree in international business. She has a
politician’s flair for communication. A session listening to her describe how the office
should run leaves one nodding in agreement.
Her opponent, Jay Ashcroft, is similarly eloquent. He is a lawyer who cites his training as
an engineer for a problem-solving attitude. He is a student of the office with the right ideas
about its duties and responsibilities. On the nuts and bolts of running the office, Ashcroft
is a reasonable choice.
Ashcroft is an ideologue with similar beliefs as his estimable father, John Ashcroft, who
served as Missouri governor, U.S. senator and U.S. attorney general. Father John was
notorious for his cultural conservatism, but I always admired his ability to keep his
religion away from his politics.
Young John follows the lead of many of today’s conservatives with expressions about
what government should be about. He told us the purpose of government is to enhance
personal liberty and freedom, “not to allow 70-year-old men to shower with teenage girls.”
This is not a disqualification for the office he seeks, but it does give a hint into his
personal political motivation. He was the primary architect of constitutional Amendment
6 on the November ballot, which would allow the General Assembly to pass a voter photo
ID law. He says voter fraud exists but has no evidence of fraud the new law would correct.
He is a believer in the concept of the law and with his drafting of the state amendment
tries to correct problems that are causing courts to ban similar laws elsewhere. Ashcroft
makes support for voter ID a major point in his campaign.
Smith adamantly disagrees. She says the proposed law would “surgically” deny the right
of her neighbors to vote and that passage of Ashcroft’s law would trigger an automatic
lawsuit.
The current Secretary of State’s Office says 220,000 registered Missourians don’t have
photo ID. Opponents of additional photo ID requirements say most of those adversely
affected would be poor and that minority people are more likely to vote Democratic.
Ashcroft, on the other hand, says the law can be implemented without interfering with
anyone’s right to vote. He says he will be happy to campaign with Donald Trump if he
campaigns in Missouri.
I like Smith’s instinct better. If no good evidence exists of identification trouble in Missouri elections, we should not impose additional burdens. Courts in other states are agreeing.
Lacking evidence of a problem, let the Missouri secretary of state spend time and energy
working to enable rather than hinder voter participation.
Robin Smith for Missouri secretary of state.

Tribune's View for Missouri Governor


THE TRIBUNE'S VIEW

For governor

Koster vs. Greitens

Democrat Chris Koster is the clear choice in this race. Not only does he have the experience
and proper inclination for the job, but his opponent is not well suited.
I first met Koster when he was a Republican state senator. I was impressed then and
even more so when he switched parties for the best of reasons: He had become
disillusioned with Republicans’ opposition to stem cell research and other anti-science
leanings.
From this political genesis, he has become an exemplar of a political type many people
support: a fiscal conservative and a cultural liberal.
In this election he is endorsed by an array of interest groups usually associated with
conservatives, including the NRA, the Farm Bureau and public safety groups, reflecting
Koster’s background as a prosecuting attorney in Cass County and a Republican legislator.
At the same time he, is supported by the AFL-CIO and other union groups. He reflects a
Missouri tradition, the conservative Democrat. (Some of Koster’s wide-ranging support
no doubt stems from his position as election front-runner.)
In a recent visit I was impressed anew, this time with Koster’s evolved political sense,
particularly his determination and, I think, his ability to collaborate more effectively
with members of the Missouri General Assembly. He made a point of his admiration for
and ability to communicate well with House Speaker Todd Richardson. Current Gov.
Jay Nixon is often criticized for a chilly relationship with the legislature that exaggerates
the gulf between the Democratic governor and the Republican General Assembly.
Koster exudes a more optimistic expectation. For instance, he anticipates a more promising conversation about expanding Medicaid, a persistent sticking point over the past few
years that has left Missouri on the wrong side of the issue.
In contrast, Republican Eric Greitens has no such heritage. He deserves respect for his
military service but is a total neophyte in political experience. Being an outsider is not a
good alternative to good experience. Greitens has adopted harsh conservative positions.
As governor, he would ratify far-right initiatives put forward by legislative Republicans.
If Koster handily wins the gubernatorial race as expected, let us hope he and lawmakers
of the other party will have reason to make more bipartisan progress than we have seen
lately. Admittedly this is asking a lot, but Koster’s clear attitude of collaboration is hope-
ful. As a Republican senator, he made a record among majority members. I look forward
to a Koster regime with enthusiasm.
Chris Koster for Missouri governor.

Tribune's View on Prop A

Proposition A

In a typically clever political move, Leone and his group also are promoting Proposition A on the November ballot, a smaller tax increase enacted by statute rather than constitutional amendment that is basically intended to head off larger increases. It would increase taxes on tobacco products a total of 23 cents per pack by 2021. Leone & Co. figure if their Proposition A passes, they will have a good argument for avoiding further increases for several years.
One can complain the petroleum and c-store group effectively stymies additional funding for transportation and other needs by consistently working against tax increases on motor fuel and tobacco, their primary stock in trade, but the main complaint should aim at state legislators and citizens at large who repeatedly agree to avoid proper funding. Years ago a proper move would have been a big increase in federal motor fuel taxes, with money rebated dollar-for-dollar to states collecting and remitting the money. I tried this idea often on candidates for Congress. None would touch the idea.
We should not waste time criticizing the morals or intent of Leone and his group. We should beat them at the polls, so to speak.
Should we vote for Proposition A? It’s a devilish question. We need the money, but Proposition A is a half-loaf destined to postpone rather than enhance road and bridge funding. Leone’s group will win either way.
I’m in the mood to vote “No” on Proposition A in hopes we can quickly get on to a better plan, but I reckon the thing will pass, providing a trickle of current funding but keeping us in the funding mire a while longer.
HJW III

MNEA View on Amendment 3- Vote "NO"

Stakes for children are too high to overlook the amendment’s shortcomings

(JEFFERSON CITY, MO) – Charles E. Smith, an English teacher and President of the Missouri National Education Association, announced the 35,000 educators of the MNEA will oppose the Raise Your Hand for Kids (RYH4K) constitutional amendment.

“The stakes for children are simply too high to overlook the constitutional amendment’s shortcomings,” said Smith. “The amendment permits public tax dollars to fund programs at elite private or religious schools. It lacks strong oversight and it places all decisions in the hands of an unelected commission a majority of whom do not have a background in education. ”

The MNEA provided a background fact sheet detailing their concerns about the RYH4K amendment. Concerns they shared with the amendment’s backers over the course of meetings and other communication.

“As educators, we are deeply committed to the success of every child. MNEA educators have a long track record supporting early childhood education. We met with the RYH4K campaign early to share our concerns about the amendment and offer alternative solutions such as collaborating with local school districts and requiring early childhood programs to use proven education techniques. Unfortunately, those suggestions were not incorporated into RYH4K’s amendment,” said Smith.


The 35,000-member MNEA represents teachers, education support professionals, college faculty, retired teachers and students studying to be teachers in school districts and on college campuses throughout the state. It is the Missouri affiliate of the 3.2 million-member NEA.  

###

Raise Your Hands for Kids Constitutional Amendment
Background Fact Sheet


1) Public Funds to Elite Private or Religious Schools: RYH4K provides an exemption to Article IX, Section 8 of the Missouri Constitution, which explicitly prohibits the distribution of public money to private or religious schools. 
ARTICLE IX, Section 8 of the Missouri Constitution:
“Neither the general assembly, nor any county, city, town, township, school district or other municipal corporation, shall ever make an appropriation or pay from any public fund whatever, anything in aid of any religious creed, church or sectarian purpose, or to help to support or sustain any private or public school, academy, seminary, college, university, or other institution of learning controlled by any religious creed, church or sectarian denomination whatever; nor shall any grant or donation of personal property or real estate ever be made by the state, or any county, city, town, or other municipal corporation, for any religious creed, church, or sectarian purpose whatever.”

Raise Your Hand For Kids' proposed amendment, Section 54(b).2, states:
“Distribution of funds under this amendment shall not be limited or prohibited by the provisions of Article IX, Section 8” of the Missouri Constitution.

2) Unelected Commission of Non-experts: The Early Childhood Commission, an appointed not elected body, distributes $300 million dollars of revenue generated by the amendment via grants. Of the 13 commissioners, less than halfare required to have any experience in education.
Required to have Education Experience   Non-Educator Commissioners
  1. Designee from Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
  2. Director of Missouri Head Start Collaborative Office
  3. Early Childhood Education and Development provider*
  4. Local Head Start Agency*
  5. Higher Education**
 
  1. Member of General Assembly
  2. Member of General Assembly (other party/chamber)
  3. Designee from Department of Health and Senior Services
  4. Designee from Department of Mental Health
  5. Designee from Department of Social Services
  6. Business**
  7. Medicine**
  8. Faith Community*
*Appointed by State Board of Education. **Appointed by Governor with Senate Confirmation.


3) Lack of Oversight and Quality Control: The Early Childhood Commission and a small staff are tasked with adequately evaluating thousands of future preschool classrooms spread all across Missouri. As written, these classrooms can exist in basements, garages, storefronts, churches, or in private and public schools. At a minimum, the quality of the educator, the curriculum, the facility, the finances and the safety of each pre-school classroom must frequently be monitored. Quality control will be overwhelming for a small staff and volunteer Commission opening the door for deficiencies and problems.

4) Permanence of a Constitutional Amendment: The RYH4K creates a new tax, establishes a powerful unelected commission, and permits spending of public funds on private or religious education programs. Portions of the proposal are bound to have unintended negative consequences. Because the change is enshrined in our constitution local school boards, legislators, and courts hands will be tied unable to “fix” any damage these unintended consequences may cause. Any errors will require passing an additional constitutional amendment a process that can take years.

Learn About the Issues Before the Election-Why Vote "No" on Amendment 3

Amendment 3

Great purpose, bad weapon

For years I have supported more resources for early education, even to the point of considering a change in our total system of funding public schools that would include an earlier year of mandatory, free attendance, even to the point of substituting a year of pre-kindergarten for the senior year of high school. We should become more serious about establishing earlier education for all our children.
Proponents of this idea have offered a number of initiatives but always run up against resistance to higher taxes. This year they try again on the November ballot with Amendment 3, which would amend the state constitution to increase cigarette taxes.
Trouble is, in their commendable zeal to raise money for early education, they raise too many troublesome side issues, incurring opposition from a wide range of education organizations, medical researchers, health care advocates and politicians. The proposal even incurs opposition from both anti-abortion and pro-abortion-rights interests.
In competing columns appearing in our edition last Sunday, longtime early education advocate Jack Jensen squared off against Ron Leone, the executive director of the Missouri Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Store Association. Leone’s group generally opposes tax increases on motor fuel and tobacco, an obviously selfish position that is understandable given its narrow economic interests, but on this issue he successfully outlines the larger case against ratification of Amendment 3.
Major tobacco firms are the primary funding agencies behind the initiative. Not only does the amendment include catch-up taxation of competing, smaller off-brand cigarettes left out of earlier tobacco settlement provisions; it specifically forbids use of funds for “tobacco-related research of any kind.”
Amendment 3 allows tax money to go to private or religious schools, otherwise prohibited in the Constitution. It restricts use of money for stem cell research, treatment and cures. It incorporates an annual automatic tax increase for four years and has incurred the opposition of more than a hundred state legislators and both gubernatorial candidates.
As a general proposition, enacting a particular tax increase of this kind by amending the constitution is not a good idea. I can sympathize with proponents frustrated with the inaction of state legislators, but when they suggest enacting tax increases by way of constitutional amendment, they should at least make the language simple and entirely to the point. Amendment 3 has too many troublesome ancillary implications. A “clean” tobacco tax increase would have more public purchase. Missouri’s is the lowest cigarette tax in the nation, and our spending is in the bottom 25 percent. But given the substantial opposition that has arisen, I doubt Amendment 3 will pass.
I plan to vote “No” and continue to work for a better way to increase early education. Missouri is behind most states in funding. We should do better.

Monday, October 10, 2016

THE FINAL CANVASS!!

I hope you are able to attend the final rally for our former CMNEA President Susan McClintic,  this Friday at the Rocheport General Store. You may even help by spreading the word with a canvass drive. There will be a school bus to drive volunteers to the location and knock on doors. If you can spare a few hours, come to Rocheport this Friday, Oct. 14th. The entire event is from 4:00-7:00 p.m. 

Another opportunity to help friends of public education is this Saturday, Oct. 15th from 10:00 a.m. until 1:00 p.m. Meet at 907 E. Ash for training and directions. You may wear your CMNEA t-shirts. Feel free to share this information with members in your building. It would be fun to gather a few friends from your building and make it a weekend to support our friends! We will be supporting Susan McClintic, MNEA Friend of Education- Stephen Webber and Gubernatorial candidate Chris Koster. See you Saturday!!