10th Annual Mid-MO Legislative Dinner, Columbia | ||
Date: Thursday, Jan. 14, 2016 Time: 5:30 p.m. Mix and mingle 6:00-7:15 p.m. Dinner 7:15 - 8:00 p.m. Presentation of the Legislative Platform by Otto Fajen and introduction of area legislators Location: Columbia Area Career Center, 4203 S. Providence Road, Columbia, MO Cost: $23.00 per person Registration deadline: Jan. 13 Register online: https://www.mnea.org/missouri/LegislativeReception-MidMO.aspx Learn about the MNEA Legislative Platform, as well as meet area legislators, school board members and invited guests. | Contact: Alexander Tai 3005A Troyer Drive Columbia, MO 65203 alexander.l.tai@gmail.com or (573) 825-7183 |
Saturday, December 19, 2015
Sunday, November 29, 2015
10 Reasons Why Unions Are Economically Important
ILLINOIS ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: 10 WAYS UNIONS BOOST ECONOMIC
EFFICIENCY
A RECENT REPORT BY THE ILLINOIS ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE, A NON-PROFIT THINK
TANK AND ADVOCATE OF LABOR UNIONS, LISTED 10 WAYS UNIONS HELP BOOST THE ECONOMY.
Here are the main findings from the report along with a brief summary for each:
1. Union workers earn higher wages and increase consumer demand
Full-time union workers, or those who work at least 35 hours a week, earn $4,400 more in annual
wages and contribute about $1,000 more in federal income taxes than comparable
non-union workers. With higher average incomes, union members spend more in the
economy, which the report says creates jobs and offsets “potential negative effects that
unions have on total employment.”
2. Unions reduce socially inefficient levels of income inequality
Unionization tends to reduce wage inequality, which benefits middle- and low-wage workers the
most. The reduction in income inequality helps improve the economy as working and
middle-class families spend a greater proportion of their incomes.
3. Union workers receive less government assistance
Full-time union workers are more likely to have employer-provided health insurance
as well as retirement plans through pensions.
4. Union workers contribute more in income taxes
On average, union members pay roughly $1,000 more in federal taxes and
more than $500 in state income taxes per year than comparable full-time
non-union workers.
5. Unions increase productivity in construction, manufacturing and education
Unionization, particularly in the private construction industry, increases
worker productivity by $0.805 per hour per worker.
“Illinois had the highest construction industry unionization in 2012, at 38.2
percent compared to the national average of 13.2 percent. However, blue-collar construction workers in Illinois added $87.72 in value per hour worked to the
state’s economy, the 5th-highest productivity in the nation.”
6. Unions reduce employee turnover rates
“Unions institute democratic workplaces that give workers a voice and
standardize safety procedures. Through effective grievance procedures,
unions protect workers against both workplace conflict and the abuses of
managerial authority. On net, the result is a workforce with high morale,
so workers do not want to quit.”
7. Unions fight against child labor and for public education
Pressure from labor organizations during the Great Depression led to
the passage of the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1938, which regulated the
minimum age of employment for children, among other things.
“Thus, by working to reduce child labor and to increase funding of public
education, unions have increased national economic productivity over the
long run.”
8. Unions fight against all forms of discrimination
“Today, labor unions remain at the forefront of anti-discrimination legislation.
Unions continue to partner with civil rights groups, women’s organizations
and equal pay supporters, and the LGBTQ community to ensure fair pay,
job safety and freedom from employment discrimination. By helping to
eliminate wage gaps and discriminatory hiring practices, unions have
helped to increase profits and improve economic efficiency.”
9. Unions collectively bargain toward efficient contracts
Collective bargaining helps employers and employees reach an agreement in
which an efficient level of union workers are hired.
“The give-and-take process exhausts all possible bargaining outcomes
between the employer and the union, and the employer hires “the ‘right’
number of workers so that the union does not distort the allocation of labor,
and there is no deadweight loss to the national economy.”
10. Unions fight against the “monopsony” power of owners, especially in sports
A monopsony is a market situation in which there only is one employer,
which allows the employer to drive down wages below the competitive level.
When workers are unionized, they’re able to return earnings to free-market
levels.
The Illinois Economic Policy Institute report concludes:
Labor unions are imperfect, but they are also far from the distortionary institutions
that shrink the economy and hurt job growth, as characterized by some
commentators and politicians. Private, public, and nonprofit organizations can
all increase and decrease economic efficiency– institutions are not inherently
economically good or bad. The same is true of labor unions. While there are
potential costs of unions, politicians and the voting public need to balance
those concerns out by also considering the economic benefits of unions.
This Economic Commentary has investigated ten examples of how unions
can– and do– increase economic efficiency. Unions still play a significant role
in the American economy. Ultimately, unions boost consumer demand, reduce
reliance on government assistance programs, support tax revenues, increase
productivity, fight against social inefficiencies, and counter the power of big
businesses. In evaluating the pros and cons of labor unions in the modern
economy, these benefits must be considered.
Labor unions are imperfect, but they are also far from the distortionary institutions
that shrink the economy and hurt job growth, as characterized by some
commentators and politicians. Private, public, and nonprofit organizations can
all increase and decrease economic efficiency– institutions are not inherently
economically good or bad. The same is true of labor unions. While there are
potential costs of unions, politicians and the voting public need to balance
those concerns out by also considering the economic benefits of unions.
This Economic Commentary has investigated ten examples of how unions
can– and do– increase economic efficiency. Unions still play a significant role
in the American economy. Ultimately, unions boost consumer demand, reduce
reliance on government assistance programs, support tax revenues, increase
productivity, fight against social inefficiencies, and counter the power of big
businesses. In evaluating the pros and cons of labor unions in the modern
economy, these benefits must be considered.
Friday, November 27, 2015
Unionism and the MU Protests
How Social Justice Unionism Helped Spark Mizzou Protests
From NEA Today
An anti-racism boycott by Black football players at University of Missouri may have been the final straw for the teetering Mizzou president, who resigned on Monday, but student activism on campus started months ago when the university abruptly eliminated health benefits for all of its thousands of graduate students.
Two days before the start of the semester, grad students were left reeling, wondering how they would pay for their medications, or how they would deliver their babies, recalls Ph.D. student Eric O. Scott. And so they met, in the hundreds, to talk about what actions they could take to ensure that they would have a voice in their working conditions.
“I was speaking, and I didn’t say the word ‘union.’ But people were shouting the word ‘union’ from the audience,” Scott recalls.
Since then, the graduate students in that room have become the Coalition of Graduate Workers, a unionizing group with the support of the Missouri National Education Association (MNEA). They seek to improve the teaching and learning conditions for students, and also have become a force for social justice on campus, aligned with Concerned Student 1950, a group that was formed to address institutional racism on campus.
“Eric and I are firmly committed to social justice — and everybody we’ve talked to about the union has been on the same page,” said Connor Lewis, a Coalition organizer who is seeking a Ph.D in history. “People really respond to the idea that this isn’t just about workplace benefits. It’s also about your students.”
Graduate students — or graduate assistants (GA) — are employees at universities who often teach undergraduate classes and conduct research, even while completing their own Ph.D degrees. And yet, despite their critical role in teaching and learning, they have little job security, not much access to health benefits, and are paid poverty-level wages: an average $15,455 per year, according to the NEA Higher Education Advocate.
And yet, the Missouri GAs aren’t unique in their broad view of unionism. In fact, GA unions rarely focus solely on salaries and other contract-negotiating issues, experts say. Instead they “function as social movement unions that link the struggles of graduate employees to the pursuit of social justice,” wrote Deeb-Paul Kitchen in 2014 in NEA’s journal of higher education Thought & Action.
And, of course, NEA also has a long history of promoting racial equality and justice — from its historic mid-20th century work around desegregation to its current work to end the school-to-prison pipeline. This week, NEA’s Advisory Committee of Student Members issued a statement commending University of Missouri students “for their courage in speaking out against ignorance and institutional racism.” The committee also promised to “continue to fight institutional racism and advocate for positive change for students who are marginalized within our educational systems.”
Walking Out for Justice
In August, after the revocation of GA health benefits was announced, the Coalition of Graduate Workers staged a one-day voluntary walkout and a rally involving more than 1,500 students and faculty. Scott recalls that Jonathan Butler, who commanded the nation’s attention this month as the hunger striker who said he would die for the cause of racial equality, was in the front lines of the rally, working a handheld megaphone.
Within days, the university had reversed its stance. It would continue providing the same level of health benefits to its GAs through the academic year, officials said. The then-chancellor also provided a personal guarantee that GAs would have subsidized benefits in the future — but, of course, the chancellor is gone now, Lewis notes, and his abrupt departure provides more evidence that a collectively bargained contract would be far more useful to graduate students than a personal pledge.
A second Coalition of Graduate Workers walk-out was held on Monday and Tuesday, this time for two days and in direct support of the racial equity protests, Scott says. “The concerns and difficulties that Black graduate students face, those are our concerns as well,” he says.
“Our feeling was we needed to contribute an extra push,” Lewis says.
Many of the students protesting anti-racism at Mizzou also see themselves as part of a continuum of activism, taking place across the country, aimed at racial equality. They have linked their efforts to the Black Lives Matter movement, and to the community protests that followed the deaths of Black men, like Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., and Freddie Gray in Baltimore, at the hands of police.
At the University of Missouri, their efforts are paying off: Not only have the president of the university system resigned and the campus chancellor stepped down, but the university’s governing body, the Board of Curators, has announced the hiring of a new diversity, inclusion and equity officer. The university also has promised to require diversity and inclusion training for all faculty, staff, and students, and to create a task force to improve inclusion.
Photo: Matt Hellman/Missourian via AP
Friday, November 13, 2015
Kick-Off for Tom Pauley- 44th House Seat
CITIZENS FOR TOM PAULEY
PO BOX 382
HALLS VILLE, MO 55255
|
You are cordially invited to a
CAMPAIGN KICK-OFF FUNDRAISER
for
CAMPAIGN KICK-OFF FUNDRAISER
for
TOM PAULEY
for the 44th House District
for the 44th House District
TUES, DEC 1, 2015
5:00 - 7:00 p.m.
COMO Smoke and Fire
4600 Paris Road
Columbia, MO |
Suggested contribution amounts:
Sponsor: $500— Host: $250— Friend: $100— Supporter: $50— Sustainer: $25
All contributions are appreciated. Please make checks payable to: CITIZENS FOR Tom PAULEY PO Box 382
Hallsville, MO 65255 or donate online at www.PAuLEY44.com
Hallsville, MO 65255 or donate online at www.PAuLEY44.com
PAULEY4410M
PAID FOR BY CITIZENS FOR TOM PAULEY, ELAINE GEORGE -- TREASURER.
Saturday, October 24, 2015
CPS Introduces Tax Levy and Bond Issue Increase for Spring Election
Bond issue and operating levy increase discussed at CPS's World Cafe
- MAYA MCDOWELL, JULIA QUADE
- COLUMBIA — Columbia Public Schools Superintendent Peter Stiepleman discussed a bond issue and an operating levy increase Thursday night at the district’s World Cafe, a community discussion eventThe bond issue and operating levy increase would fund areas in need of improvement and help support current operations, Stiepleman said.About 150 people attended the event at the Holiday Inn Executive Center. The district has been using World Cafe as a method of discussion for several years, according to previous Missourian reporting.Stiepleman opened the evening by singing “We Are One” to the room filled with community members, educators and School Board members.He said the song reflected the district's values.The bond issue would fund construction, renovation, technology and equipment in the district from 2016-2022. The total expense would be $35 million, which would be broken up to pay for:
- One new middle school
- Two elementary school additions
- Equitable athletics facilities for elementary and middle schools
- One kitchen expansion/renovation
- Major school improvements such as roofs, parking lots, HVAC and windows.
Stiepleman expressed a need for a new middle school on the south side of Columbia because of growing numbers in that area of the district.“We are looking down the road 10 years from now and seeing the kind of growth south of town, and land will never be available again,” Stiepleman said.Gentry Middle School, the only middle school in the south side of town, is the largest in the district, with approximately 850 students, School Board Vice President Jonathan Sessions said.Stiepleman also offered the idea of turning Jefferson Middle School into a STEM and arts middle school, also known as STEAM.The operating levy increase would allow the district to continue funding regular operation expenses, provide support for an increasing number of students and help recruit high quality faculty, according to Stiepleman's presentation.The increase would be 55 cents or 65 cents. The revenue from a 55-cent increase would be $12.1 million. The revenue from a 65-cent increase would be $14.3 million, according to the presentation.At the end of the event, attendees had opportunities to weigh in on the proposed levy increase and bond issue during three rounds of discussion. The conversations covered three different topics:- How should our community support high quality employees and students?
- How should our community support managing growth and facility maintenance and improvements?
- Pros and cons for improving district funding
After Stiepleman spoke, Oliver "Buzz" Thomas, the president of Great Schools Partnership in Knoxville, Tennessee, spoke about the importance of quality education.Thomas, an author, said he once read that the way to write a good book is to write the truest sentence you know and then write another one.“I flew halfway across the country tonight to tell you the truest sentence I know about public education,” Thomas said. “And I’m going to tell it to you right now. The community with the best schools wins.”Thomas said the safest communities are the most educated communities.“The more education you have and the better it is, the healthier you are,” he said. “The great news is you already have good schools.”He said the stresses of poverty, however, make it “physically hard to learn.”“If a grizzly bear walked in here tonight, you and I could not work a New York Times crossword puzzle,” Thomas said as the audience laughed. “But we could run faster than we’ve ever run before. … If the grizzly bear lives in my neighborhood and I run into it every single day, I’m going to have a hard time learning and that is the challenge.”Thomas noted the importance of people making a commitment.“A public commitment is hard to walk away from,” he said. “You have to decide you are really going to be the best and you have to say it.”He said people must also be willing to invest not only in buying land and infrastructure but also in people. He said the most important thing in the city is the teachers.He said it warmed his heart to see everyone with their “collective wisdom and brain power and resources” trying to figure out how to create the greatest schools in Missouri.“Kansas City is famous for steaks and baseball. St. Louis is famous for beer and baseball. Let’s make Columbia famous for something that really matters. Let’s make Columbia famous for its schools,” he said.Roger Fries, who had two children attend Columbia schools, said he attended the event because he was concerned about the money the school district spent on the newly built schools.“I don’t like all the money the school district puts into these buildings, and they put them in very expensive land,” Fries said. “I think they could put that money into actual education — teachers, better equipped classrooms, a wider curriculum and whatever they need.
Saturday, October 17, 2015
How Boone County Candidates Fared During Fundraising Quarter
Webber outpaces Rowden in fundraising for 19th District Senate seat
By RUDI KELLER
Friday, October 16, 2015 Columbia Daily Tribune
Democratic state Rep. Stephen Webber raised more than twice as much as Republican state Rep. Caleb Rowden in the race for Boone County’s state Senate seat during the last three months and held almost five times as much cash as Rowden on Sept. 30.
Campaigns filed quarterly campaign finance reports Thursday. In the only other local race where opposing candidates filed reports, Democratic candidate Susan McClintic took in $19,120 for the 47th House District seat, exceeding the total for incumbent Rep. Chuck Basye, R-Rocheport, by almost $7,000.
Webber and Rowden want to replace state Sen. Kurt Schaefer, R-Columbia, who must leave office because of term limits. Webber and Rowden have estimated their campaigns each will have to spend about $1.5 million by November 2016.
Webber raised $118,110 in the three months ending Sept. 30, bringing his total for the campaign to $388,901. Including funds left over from previous campaigns, he had $402,850 in the bank.
“This is our third quarter of really working on Senate fundraising, and the community has continued to support me, and I am excited about that,” Webber said.
Webber’s campaign raised about half its total from political action committees, businesses with legislative interests and fellow Democrats. The largest donors were the carpenter’s union, $10,000, and Ameren Missouri, $7,831. Webber, an attorney, also took in about $14,000 from lawyers living outside the district.
Rowden raised $52,665 in the quarter, lifting his total since the 2014 election to $109,219. He had $85,020 on hand Sept. 30.
More than $45,000 of Rowden’s receipts were from political action committees, businesses with legislative interests and other Republicans. His largest contributions were $7,500 from Sen. Mike Kehoe, R-Jefferson City, and $5,001 from Sen. Brian Munzlinger, R-Williamstown.
Rowden did not respond to a message seeking comment.
Webber supports limits on campaign contributions but will not set a personal limit, he said.
“When we have people running around writing half-million dollar checks, we have to change the system, but one person unilaterally putting caps on themselves isn’t going to work,” he said.
There will be contested races in at least three of the five House districts representing Boone County. In two, the 44th District and the 46th District, only Democrats have been campaigning long enough to file a quarterly report.
In the 44th District, Hallsville alderman Tom Pauley, a Democrat, reported $34.41 in the bank. Hallsville Mayor Cheri Reisch is seeking the Republican nomination.
Martha Stevens has been raising money since early in the year for her bid to replace Webber in the 46th District. She raised $6,088 during the quarter and had $21,285 on hand. Don Waterman is seeking the GOP nomination.
Lawmakers elected from the two districts so far uncontested for 2016, Reps. Kip Kendrick, D-Columbia, and Caleb Jones, R-Columbia, were not idle during the quarter. Kendrick, of the 45th District, took in $8,255 and had $19,015 on hand. Jones, who represents the 50th District, raised $62,900 and had $240,938 on hand.
McClintic, who is making her first bid for office, said she feels good about her chances in the district Basye won narrowly in 2014.
“The Boone County area has always had great representation from Democrats, our state leaders are Democrats and I think we will continue to see that,” she said. “People are ready for a change.”
Basye raised $12,255 and had $13,318 on hand. His total includes $5,360 from political action committees and businesses with interests before the legislature. His largest donation, $1,000, came from Noranda, an aluminum maker in southeast Missouri.
Basye said he does not feel he is behind because of the difference in fundraising. “I am not worried about what Susan is doing,” he said. “I am going to do what I am doing. I got a late start on fundraising so I am not worried at all.”
Sunday, October 11, 2015
Check out the Pages on Our Blog
There are a few political events taking place the week of Oct. 12th. If you would like to know more about them, and learn about a few debate parties, look on the "Candidate's Events" page at the top of the blog. If you are aware of Republican events and/or debate parties PLEASE contact me and share the information. I will be more than happy to place these events on the CMNEA blog.
Saturday, October 3, 2015
Incoming Sec of Education John King
Meet John B. King Jr., Who Will Be Acting U.S. Secretary of Education
By Stephen Sawchuk on October 2, 2015 6:50 PM
Then New York State Education Commissioner John King Jr. testifies during a joint legislative budget hearing on education in Albany in January, 2014.
By guest blogger Stephen Sawchuk for Politics K12
John B. King Jr., a former New York state commissioner of education, will take the reins at the U.S. Department of Education following Arne Duncan's departure in December.
The son of educators, King—who is Black and Puerto Rican—was orphaned at age 12. He credits his teachers in the New York City public school system with his success, saying they made sure he didn't fall through the cracks.(More in this Huffington Post piece by King.)
"New York City public school teachers are the reason that I'm alive," King said, as President Barack Obama introduced him at a news conference as his new acting education secretary. "They gave me hope about [what] could be possible for me in life."
And, he said, he's eager to bring Duncan's initiatives in for a landing. "It's an incredible agenda, and I'm proud to be able to carry it forward," he said.
Before joining the New York state education department, King helped open several New York City charter schools via Uncommon Schools, a New York City-based nonprofit charter-management organization.
King's tenure in New York was marked by tumult, much of it the by-product of implementing the state's ambitious Race to the Top plan. Among other policy shifts, the state adopted the Common Core State Standards in early 2011, began creating a statewide teacher-evaluation system linked to student achievement, and announced reforms to teacher-preparation programs and licensing.
Teacher evaluation would soon prove to be the toughest lift. Although the legislation that created the evaluation system had been supported by the 600,000-member New York State United Teachers, the finer-grained details posed significant challenges. State regulations fleshing out the law were contested, leading the NYSUT to sue over their format. The state was also among the first to introduce student tests measuring common-core skills, generating great concern among teachers, and ultimately fueling the "opt out" movement among parents.
During that period, King was instrumental in supporting the development of the common-core-aligned curriculum, EngageNY. The open-source curriculum is reportedly the most-used online curriculum tool in the country, although it, too, proved controversial; some teachers complained that it felt too "scripted."
In navigating the difficult role, King proved to be, at different times, both flexible and stubborn. In 2013 when the New York City district and its union could not reach agreement on how to evaluate teachers, King's ruling combined elements from both parties' arguments. Yet during a series of often-raucous open forums with parents and community members that same year, he was a steadfast supporter of the tougher common-core standards and teacher evaluation, and pushed back against plans to delay the requirements.
Teacher colleges, meanwhile, struggled to ready teachers for a new series of harder licensing exams. Many complaints centered on a demonstration-teaching exam, the edTPA, that critics said was put in place too quickly. King defended the new tests, though, saying they would help increase rigor in teaching programs.
The pressures of moving so far, so fast—coupled with an internal shuffling at NYSUT—led to a protracted battle, culminating in the union's vote of "no confidence" and call for his ouster in 2014.
At the department, King has served as the agency's face on initiatives aimed at improving student equity. He has been serving in the capacity of a senior adviser, and did not go through confirmation. It's unclear if that will be an issue for Senate Republicans.
Looking Ahead
David Steiner, King's predecessor in the New York education department, was effusive in his praise for his former deputy.
"He is the hardest-working, smartest, and most dedicated educator I've ever worked with," Steiner said. "He understands as few do that a small detail, be it in a structure of evaluation or implementing a standard, or thinking about a budgetary issue, may turn out to be huge. He had the capacity to pay attention at a level of detail as well as to see the whole, which was extraordinary."
Just what mark King could make in his new federal role remains to be seen. With the Race to the Top winding down and Congress in no mood to fund competitive programs, much of the education secretary's position's power has waned.
King will still need to keep the No Child Left Behind Act waiver process on track and to oversee the upcoming peer review of states' assessment systems.
Randi Weingarten, the president of the American Federation of Teachers, expressed hope that King might push the department in a different direction, although she wasn't sanguine on the matter.
"John King could be Nixon goes to China. He could be the person who helps get [the Elementary and Secondary Education Act] fixed," she said. "Hopefully he's learned enough from everything that's happened in his life to do that. But New York was center stage to this polarization. New York's [teacher]-evaluation system has changed four times. It's ridiculous."
Some in the civil rights community were unhappy with the department's NCLB waivers, which they say weakened protections for disadvantaged students. Accountability is likely to be a sticking point in negotiations over reauthorizing the ESEA.
So will King approach those issues differently?
"Arne would be horrified to be thought of as the non-equity guy. It's quite clear he feels very passionately and in fact is driven by kids and what he thinks is right for kids and low-income kids and kids of color in particular," said Kati Haycock, the executive director of the Education Trust, an advocacy organization."Obviously we've had some real differences with him around accountability."
And she added, "John's decision in New York to make those [issues] front and center certainly makes me believe he understands very much how this needs to be a priority for all schools and driven through the state ratings systems and not just something on the side."
Alyson Klein and Liana Heitin contributed to this story.
NEA Board of Directors Endorse Clinton for Democratic Primary
NEA Endorses Hillary Clinton in Democratic Primary
By Alyson Klein on October 3, 2015
It's official: The National Education Association is putting its muscle, money, and legions of teacher volunteers behind Hillary Clinton in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination.
The endorsement comes despite serious misgivings from some of its affiliates, who were hoping for Vermont senator Bernie Sanders, or at least a slower endorsement process that would give the union more time to extract policy promises from Clinton. (Plus, there's always the chance that Vice President Joe Biden, who has long had a great relationship with the union, may jump in.)
Still, Clinton got the support of 75 percent of NEA's 170 member Board of directors. (She only needed 58 percent.) Three candidates sought the NEA's seal of approval: Clinton, Sanders and former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley.
Sanders is surging in the polls in the crucial early states of Iowa and New Hampshire. And in the most recent quarter, he raised nearly as much money as Clinton, mostly from small donors. (Check out this priceless Onion story about how these donations make Sanders beholden to the wishes of, well, elementary school teachers.) Both the New Jersey Education Association and Massachusetts Teachers Association said they won't back an NEA primary endorsement at this time.
NEA's Endorsement Process
But NEA's president, Lily Eskelsen Garcia, sounds pretty excited about the pick. She told Education Week that the union had some great choices this time around.
"All three of these fine people are friends of the NEA, so it wasn't like who is the bad guy here. We love all of them," she said.
But the union ultimately settled on Clinton because of what NEA's board saw as a long-standing commitment to children's issues, dating all the way back to her days at Yale Law School, when she took a summer gig bolstering educational opportunities for migrant kids and students in special education.
"Here is a law student who said instead of going to Wall Street, I'll go to the Children's Defense Fund," Eskelsen Garcia said. She ticked off Clinton's other work for kids, including her championship of children's health issues as first lady of Arkansas and first lady of the nation.
Clinton spent over an hour taking questions from NEA's board on issues like standardized testing (as a senator, Clinton voted for No Child Left Behind) and charter schools (Clinton has supported them in the past.)
She handled the questions like a champ, Eskelsen Garcia said. Clinton told members that tests were never supposed to give the whole picture of a child's achievement and that charter schools were meant to help test-drive new ideas that could ultimately benefit public schools.
As for the timing of the endorsement? "This was the right time to impact the primary," Eskelsen Garcia said. The union used the same "transparent" process in making the endorsement it has used for decades, she added.
Social Media Pushback
It's unclear if Clinton's answers will assuage the union's progressive wing, including the Badass Teachers Association, a caucus within the larger union.
"Yes, this could build our power, but at what cost," said Becca Ritchie, who chairs the caucus in a statement. "This does not make us stronger. People feel their voices are NOT heard. This is not a good strategy."
And some teachers and rank-and-file members unhappy with the endorsement have taken their beef to Twitter using the hashtag #NoEarlyEndorsement.
Clinton already has the backing of the American Federation of Teachers. (She and the union's president, Randi Weingarten, go way back.)
The AFT backed Clinton in the 2008 primary, but the NEA didn't endorse anyone. (It backed Obama in the general election.)
And the union may have lived to regret that move when Obama and his now departing education secretary, Arne Duncan, pushed through teacher evaluations tied to test scores, expanded charter schools, and called for states to use dramatic school turnaround strategies that encouraged schools to replace teachers and principals. Clinton, on the other hand, had been urging caution on performance pay. (More on her record here.)
This time around, Democratic candidates have been virtually silent on K-12. Instead, they've been hitting early childhood education, and especially, higher education, hard on the stump.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)