Sunday, February 7, 2016
Tuesday, January 19, 2016
CMNEA- Attend the Screenings!
CMNEA's Columbia Public School Candidate Screenings!
CMNEA educators and staff in the Columbia Public School district are invited to attend the school board screenings. Here is what you will need to know:
- When- February 10th- our last screening
- Where- Mary Paxton Keeley Elementary School Media Center (201 Park DeVille Dr.)
- Time- 6:00 -8:00 p.m.
- What can I do as an audience participant- You may come to watch/listen to the questions asked of the candidates. A basket with cards/pencils will be placed out and available for you to write a question of the candidates. If time allows, the CMNEA screening team will ask your question. Our questions are based on our survey that was sent to the candidates earlier, and we will follow up on questions for clarity and better understanding. Our forum will focus on details of the goals that the candidates have as continuing or future board members.
- Is this the public forum? NO! This is a screening of the candidates, for CMNEA members to get to know the candidates a bit better. The PUBLIC FORUM will take place on February 18th and ALL are invited to attend.
Hope you can join us!
Saturday, January 9, 2016
New Candidate for 46th MO District Seat
Boone County official enters 46th District House race
A Boone County elected official said Friday she will challenge a fellow Democrat to represent her party in the November election for the 46th District seat in the Missouri House.
Public Administrator Cathy Richards, who was first elected in 2008 and re-elected in 2012, said she is running as a Democrat who can work with the Republicans who hold solid majorities in both chambers of the General Assembly. She will face social worker Martha Stevens in the August primary. Stevens is backed by the current 46th District representative, Stephen Webber, who is seeking a state Senate seat.
Richards said Paul Quinn, a former Democratic state representative from Boone County, is chairman of her campaign committee, which also includes Republicans.
“I’m going as a moderate Democrat, not a liberal Democrat,” Richards said. “I believe that, through communication and cooperation and consensus, we can get something done.”
Richards said political parties, including her own, have put party advancement over the best interests of their constituents, as illustrated by the tenor of today’s political battles.
“Number one, I want to go for the people, not the party,” Richards said. “Number two, I really want to be a representative. ... I want to represent the district,” instead of fighting purely ideological battles.
Richards said voters need a choice in candidates other than those picked by a select few who hold political power. She said those comments were not aimed at Stevens, but more a general observation of how political parties operate.
Richards said she was inspired to run in part by archaic state laws governing how public administrators care for their wards. The public administrator serves as the court-appointed guardian or conservator for incapacitated or disabled persons and minors. The administrator also is the personal representative in the estates of deceased clients. She said she has experience working in the state Capitol as president of the Missouri Association of Public Administrators. She is also on the board of the Missouri Association of Counties.
She said she supports Medicaid expansion, one of Stevens’ main campaign planks, but also thinks the system should be scrutinized to root out waste. The state, Richards said, is falling short in its obligations to the poor.
Her campaign’s late start compared to Stevens, whose campaign started in March, is not a concern, Richards said, citing her experience running in two primaries and two general elections. “I’ve always had somebody running against me,” she said. “I’m not saying that it didn’t bother me, because it was a lot of work for me. … But that’s democracy working.”
Stevens’ campaign said Thursday it raised $35,870.98 in 2015. Reports for the fourth quarter of 2015 are due Friday.
Stevens said she had heard Richards was interested in running but did not know Friday evening that Richards had entered the race. She said having an opponent will not alter her approach to the campaign.
“I welcome Cathy to the table and hope that we have a positive and spirited campaign,” Stevens said.
Don Waterman, a U.S. Navy veteran currently employed by Bass Pro Shops, is the only Republican so far to enter the 46th District race. Filing for the August primary begins Feb. 23.
Monday, January 4, 2016
Union and State Addresses
When to Watch State of the Union and State of the State Addresses
State of the Union- President Barack Obama on January 12, 2016 will deliver his final State of the Union address. The address will be shown on all major networks beginning at 9:00 est, 8:00 p.m, cst.
As is tradition, House Speaker Paul Ryan announced the date in a formal letter to the President, saying, "As we look ahead to the new year, we have both an opportunity and an obligation to find common ground to advance the nation's interests at home and abroad."
The annual prime time speech is typically scheduled for a Tuesday in late January or early February, and gives the president the chance to lay out his agenda for the year.
The U.S. Constitution requires that that the President must report to Congress "from time to time" on "the state of the union."
The early January date was selected by the White House, according to a senior House GOP leadership source.
State of the State- Governor Jay Nixon’s final State of the State address will be given on Wednesday, January 20th. State representatives have been told Nixon will deliver his speech to the state House and Senate in the House Chamber at 7 p.m., Wednesday January 20.
The State of the State is when the governor lays out his legislative and economic priorities for the legislative session that will have started January 6, and will present his recommended budget for Fiscal Year 2017 which begins July 1.
Nixon said budget priorities for him will be supporting K-12- and higher education, in part to protect his agreement with the state’s two- and four-year colleges and universities to freeze tuition; and to continue to help those with mental health needs.
Other priorities he has stressed and is likely to talk about in the address are ethics reform and transportation funding.
The State of the State Address will be streamed live at Missourinet.com.
Saturday, December 19, 2015
| 10th Annual Mid-MO Legislative Dinner, Columbia | ||
| Date: Thursday, Jan. 14, 2016 Time: 5:30 p.m. Mix and mingle 6:00-7:15 p.m. Dinner 7:15 - 8:00 p.m. Presentation of the Legislative Platform by Otto Fajen and introduction of area legislators Location: Columbia Area Career Center, 4203 S. Providence Road, Columbia, MO Cost: $23.00 per person Registration deadline: Jan. 13 Register online: https://www.mnea.org/missouri/LegislativeReception-MidMO.aspx Learn about the MNEA Legislative Platform, as well as meet area legislators, school board members and invited guests. | Contact: Alexander Tai 3005A Troyer Drive Columbia, MO 65203 alexander.l.tai@gmail.com or (573) 825-7183 | |
Sunday, November 29, 2015
10 Reasons Why Unions Are Economically Important
ILLINOIS ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: 10 WAYS UNIONS BOOST ECONOMIC
EFFICIENCY
A RECENT REPORT BY THE ILLINOIS ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE, A NON-PROFIT THINK
TANK AND ADVOCATE OF LABOR UNIONS, LISTED 10 WAYS UNIONS HELP BOOST THE ECONOMY.
Here are the main findings from the report along with a brief summary for each:
1. Union workers earn higher wages and increase consumer demand
Full-time union workers, or those who work at least 35 hours a week, earn $4,400 more in annual
wages and contribute about $1,000 more in federal income taxes than comparable
non-union workers. With higher average incomes, union members spend more in the
economy, which the report says creates jobs and offsets “potential negative effects that
unions have on total employment.”
2. Unions reduce socially inefficient levels of income inequality
Unionization tends to reduce wage inequality, which benefits middle- and low-wage workers the
most. The reduction in income inequality helps improve the economy as working and
middle-class families spend a greater proportion of their incomes.
3. Union workers receive less government assistance
Full-time union workers are more likely to have employer-provided health insurance
as well as retirement plans through pensions.
4. Union workers contribute more in income taxes
On average, union members pay roughly $1,000 more in federal taxes and
more than $500 in state income taxes per year than comparable full-time
non-union workers.
5. Unions increase productivity in construction, manufacturing and education
Unionization, particularly in the private construction industry, increases
worker productivity by $0.805 per hour per worker.
“Illinois had the highest construction industry unionization in 2012, at 38.2
percent compared to the national average of 13.2 percent. However, blue-collar construction workers in Illinois added $87.72 in value per hour worked to the
state’s economy, the 5th-highest productivity in the nation.”
6. Unions reduce employee turnover rates
“Unions institute democratic workplaces that give workers a voice and
standardize safety procedures. Through effective grievance procedures,
unions protect workers against both workplace conflict and the abuses of
managerial authority. On net, the result is a workforce with high morale,
so workers do not want to quit.”
7. Unions fight against child labor and for public education
Pressure from labor organizations during the Great Depression led to
the passage of the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1938, which regulated the
minimum age of employment for children, among other things.
“Thus, by working to reduce child labor and to increase funding of public
education, unions have increased national economic productivity over the
long run.”
8. Unions fight against all forms of discrimination
“Today, labor unions remain at the forefront of anti-discrimination legislation.
Unions continue to partner with civil rights groups, women’s organizations
and equal pay supporters, and the LGBTQ community to ensure fair pay,
job safety and freedom from employment discrimination. By helping to
eliminate wage gaps and discriminatory hiring practices, unions have
helped to increase profits and improve economic efficiency.”
9. Unions collectively bargain toward efficient contracts
Collective bargaining helps employers and employees reach an agreement in
which an efficient level of union workers are hired.
“The give-and-take process exhausts all possible bargaining outcomes
between the employer and the union, and the employer hires “the ‘right’
number of workers so that the union does not distort the allocation of labor,
and there is no deadweight loss to the national economy.”
10. Unions fight against the “monopsony” power of owners, especially in sports
A monopsony is a market situation in which there only is one employer,
which allows the employer to drive down wages below the competitive level.
When workers are unionized, they’re able to return earnings to free-market
levels.
The Illinois Economic Policy Institute report concludes:
Labor unions are imperfect, but they are also far from the distortionary institutions
that shrink the economy and hurt job growth, as characterized by some
commentators and politicians. Private, public, and nonprofit organizations can
all increase and decrease economic efficiency– institutions are not inherently
economically good or bad. The same is true of labor unions. While there are
potential costs of unions, politicians and the voting public need to balance
those concerns out by also considering the economic benefits of unions.
This Economic Commentary has investigated ten examples of how unions
can– and do– increase economic efficiency. Unions still play a significant role
in the American economy. Ultimately, unions boost consumer demand, reduce
reliance on government assistance programs, support tax revenues, increase
productivity, fight against social inefficiencies, and counter the power of big
businesses. In evaluating the pros and cons of labor unions in the modern
economy, these benefits must be considered.
Labor unions are imperfect, but they are also far from the distortionary institutions
that shrink the economy and hurt job growth, as characterized by some
commentators and politicians. Private, public, and nonprofit organizations can
all increase and decrease economic efficiency– institutions are not inherently
economically good or bad. The same is true of labor unions. While there are
potential costs of unions, politicians and the voting public need to balance
those concerns out by also considering the economic benefits of unions.
This Economic Commentary has investigated ten examples of how unions
can– and do– increase economic efficiency. Unions still play a significant role
in the American economy. Ultimately, unions boost consumer demand, reduce
reliance on government assistance programs, support tax revenues, increase
productivity, fight against social inefficiencies, and counter the power of big
businesses. In evaluating the pros and cons of labor unions in the modern
economy, these benefits must be considered.
Friday, November 27, 2015
Unionism and the MU Protests
How Social Justice Unionism Helped Spark Mizzou Protests
From NEA Today
Two days before the start of the semester, grad students were left reeling, wondering how they would pay for their medications, or how they would deliver their babies, recalls Ph.D. student Eric O. Scott. And so they met, in the hundreds, to talk about what actions they could take to ensure that they would have a voice in their working conditions.
“I was speaking, and I didn’t say the word ‘union.’ But people were shouting the word ‘union’ from the audience,” Scott recalls.
Since then, the graduate students in that room have become the Coalition of Graduate Workers, a unionizing group with the support of the Missouri National Education Association (MNEA). They seek to improve the teaching and learning conditions for students, and also have become a force for social justice on campus, aligned with Concerned Student 1950, a group that was formed to address institutional racism on campus.
“Eric and I are firmly committed to social justice — and everybody we’ve talked to about the union has been on the same page,” said Connor Lewis, a Coalition organizer who is seeking a Ph.D in history. “People really respond to the idea that this isn’t just about workplace benefits. It’s also about your students.”
Graduate students — or graduate assistants (GA) — are employees at universities who often teach undergraduate classes and conduct research, even while completing their own Ph.D degrees. And yet, despite their critical role in teaching and learning, they have little job security, not much access to health benefits, and are paid poverty-level wages: an average $15,455 per year, according to the NEA Higher Education Advocate.
And yet, the Missouri GAs aren’t unique in their broad view of unionism. In fact, GA unions rarely focus solely on salaries and other contract-negotiating issues, experts say. Instead they “function as social movement unions that link the struggles of graduate employees to the pursuit of social justice,” wrote Deeb-Paul Kitchen in 2014 in NEA’s journal of higher education Thought & Action.
And, of course, NEA also has a long history of promoting racial equality and justice — from its historic mid-20th century work around desegregation to its current work to end the school-to-prison pipeline. This week, NEA’s Advisory Committee of Student Members issued a statement commending University of Missouri students “for their courage in speaking out against ignorance and institutional racism.” The committee also promised to “continue to fight institutional racism and advocate for positive change for students who are marginalized within our educational systems.”
Walking Out for Justice
In August, after the revocation of GA health benefits was announced, the Coalition of Graduate Workers staged a one-day voluntary walkout and a rally involving more than 1,500 students and faculty. Scott recalls that Jonathan Butler, who commanded the nation’s attention this month as the hunger striker who said he would die for the cause of racial equality, was in the front lines of the rally, working a handheld megaphone.
Within days, the university had reversed its stance. It would continue providing the same level of health benefits to its GAs through the academic year, officials said. The then-chancellor also provided a personal guarantee that GAs would have subsidized benefits in the future — but, of course, the chancellor is gone now, Lewis notes, and his abrupt departure provides more evidence that a collectively bargained contract would be far more useful to graduate students than a personal pledge.
A second Coalition of Graduate Workers walk-out was held on Monday and Tuesday, this time for two days and in direct support of the racial equity protests, Scott says. “The concerns and difficulties that Black graduate students face, those are our concerns as well,” he says.
“Our feeling was we needed to contribute an extra push,” Lewis says.
Many of the students protesting anti-racism at Mizzou also see themselves as part of a continuum of activism, taking place across the country, aimed at racial equality. They have linked their efforts to the Black Lives Matter movement, and to the community protests that followed the deaths of Black men, like Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., and Freddie Gray in Baltimore, at the hands of police.
At the University of Missouri, their efforts are paying off: Not only have the president of the university system resigned and the campus chancellor stepped down, but the university’s governing body, the Board of Curators, has announced the hiring of a new diversity, inclusion and equity officer. The university also has promised to require diversity and inclusion training for all faculty, staff, and students, and to create a task force to improve inclusion.
Photo: Matt Hellman/Missourian via AP
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
